Skip to main content

Queries over legality of the 2019/2020 Kenyan Budget

Kenya's Cabinet Secretary for Finance Henry Rotich.
Kenya's Cabinet Secretary for Finance Henry Rotich with his briefcase outside the Parliament Buildings on June 13, 2019 before going to read the 2019/2020 Budget. PHOTO | FRANCIS NDERITU | NATION MEDIA GROUP.

The legality of the 2019/20 budget-making process in Kenya may come to haunt the National Treasury after it emerged that it failed to comply with a High Court ruling of 2018.
The ruling by Justice Winfrida Okwany on September 19, 2018 made it mandatory that Treasury Cabinet Secretary (CS) must present both the budget estimates and Finance Bill to the National Assembly.

PETITION
However, when National Treasury Cabinet Secretary Mr Henry Rotich presented the Sh2.81trillion budget estimates in April this year, there was no Finance Bill.

The estimates would later be varied by the National Assembly Committee on Budget and Appropriations to Sh3.02 trillion.

The Public Finance Management(PFM) Act, which guides the current budget-making regime, provides that the estimates must be presented at least two months before the end of every financial year.
Justice Okwany ruled that the Finance Bill, which gives the government the legal force to collect taxes to finance its budget, must be enacted before the budget highlights and the revenue collection measures presented to the National Assembly.

The argument by the court in the petition filed by activist Okiya Omtatah was that the government ‘cannot budget for what it does not have or has not collected’.

As an effect of the ruling, the court nullified the Provisional Collection of Taxes and Duties Act of 2018,which the government through Kenya Revenue Authority, had been using to collect revenue pending the passing of the Finance Bill. “Any other parts or provisions thereof, including taxation, cannot be implemented before the Finance Bill becomes an Act,” Justice Okwany said of the Provisional Collection of Taxes and Duties Law.

APPEALED

The ruling had a great impact on the Value Added Tax and other sin taxes that have previously come into effect on the midnight of the day the budget highlights are presented by the Treasury CS.

The collection of revenue by the taxman was based on the fact that different sections and schedules of the Finance Act come into force on diverse dates - from July1, the start of every financial year and beyond. Though there was ample time for the Treasury to propose amendments to the PFM Act to comply with the court ruling, it failed to do so.

Interestingly, the Treasury never appealed, meaning the ruling is now part of the law.
On Thursday, Kitui Central MP Makali Mulu admitted that the budget-making process failed to comply with the court ruling.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Facts The Economist Got Them Wrong on Magufuli

DAR ES SALAAM, East Africa:  By Dr. Hernan Louise Verhofstadt* “ A BIT like President Donald Trump, Tanzania’s president, John Magufuli, likes to fire employees on television. In November Mr. Magufuli used a live broadcast from a small town in the north of the country summarily to dismiss two officials,” this is an extract from a recent online article I came across from the newspaper that I admired when I was growing up in Europe back in 1990’s; the Economist . Before I venture into other serious issues, the excerpts above contains gross factual errors; my own fact-check indicates that in the named public rally during the opening of Kagera Airport, there was no summary dismissal of the two officials instantly on television, as alleged. Instead, the two, one District Executive Directors for Bukoba Urban and another for Rural were relieved their duties later through a press release from President’s Office.   This is my prima impressio reading the Economist this

Tundu Lissu, a despot in the shadow?

By Masinde Masondore, Montreal, Canada, 01-04-2018:  WHEN a learned politician brags of publicly embarrassing his President and counts it an honor while deliberately sabotages the nation's economic interests is a misfit in African traditions. 'Africans have had own ways of criticising the King, the way it happened in ancient Israel, however, in any case, the nation's interests were set apart from any sabotage," Gilbert Moshi. Tindu Lissu, a controversial Tanzanian opposition politician would be leaning on a wrong wall. He chose a road less travelled by learned individuals who mostly were rational. The road he walks and the philosophy he exhibit, only label him a tyranny of darkness. Any democratic leader, whether in opposition or ruling party ought to be totally enveloped in wisdom which prevents monumental errors of judgment. Lissu does not exhibit a minute of it. One of the pillars of customer-focused policies in the business world i

FIVE THINGS MP LISSU IS LYING TO THE WORLD; AN OPEN LETTER

From: Concerned Tanzanian Citizen; To: WRI, WU, EU, International Press, USAID, US Gov, Tanzanian Diaspora; Date: 28 January, 2019     Dear all, Greetings from Tanzania- the land of Kilimanjaro, Serengeti, Ngorogoro, Zanzibar and above all, the land of great peace, transformation and reforms under President John Pombe Magufuli. I have leant that your various institutions will, in the course of this week and beyond, accommodate the opposition lawmaker from Tanzania, Tundu Lissu, to speak about diverse issues on politics in Tanzania. Unfortunately the power thirsty politician will not tell you all you need to know. In my first open letter to you, I will focus into 5 truths that this MP will hide to you, and in the second, I will dwell into major transformations happening in Tanzania, that again, MP Lissu cannot dare a mention to you.                              Attack on His Life and Ensuing Propaganda The MP will obviously reminisce on the unfortun